2013,http://oakleylunettespascher.webs.com/L’objectif du s est d’interroger l’op de la th des mondes possibles pour la th litt et plus pr pour l’analyse des textes,sacs pas cher.
Sont d’abord les ant historiques de cette d depuis les ann 70,carrera lunettes, et la diversit des horizons th auxquels appartiennent les chercheurs qui interviendront dans le s La place importante qu’occupera la p moderne (seizi et dix-septi si comme champ d’investigation,carrera sunglasses, g d par les th de la fiction,ray ban lunettes, l’exception de T. Pavel,lunette carrera,La typologie des mondes possibles de la fiction Panorama critique et propositions, vise la validit de la th en cernant le p de son champ d’application. En outre, la p consid voit la naissance m du concept de fiction,oakley pas cher, et une modification consid de ses fronti ce qui en rend l’ en termes de mondes possibles, particuli int Dans la lign de Thomas Pavel, et en reprenant une proposition de L,ray ban wayfarer. Dole il s’agirait de contribuer une histoire des mondes fictionnels, ou tout le moins de prendre en compte la diachronie, dans le cadre d’une th logico-s de la fiction.
Un rapide survol de la th des mondes possibles chez Umberto Eco, Thomas Pavel, Marie-Laure Ryan et Lubomir Dole am consid que la plupart des tentatives pour une typologie des mondes fictionnels implique la prise en compte de la relation d’accessibilit c’est dire la relation entre les mondes,lunette carrera, entre les mondes possibles et leurs univers de r On se propose de discuter certaines de ces th ainsi que quelques propositions alternatives,ray ban pas cher.
1)La confrontation de la d d’Umberto Eco dans Lector in Fabula et d’un article de 1975 de Thomas Pavel met en plusieurs difficult lorsqu’il s’agit d’esquisser une typologie des univers de la fiction, surtout dans une perspective diachronique. La premi tient la difficult de reconstituer l’encyclop laquelle le lecteur du pass est cens rapporter l’ afin d’ sa valeur de v La seconde est que l’id de confronter la valeur de v des risque d’amener ce que T. Pavel lui-m appelle un r na Est ensuite discut la typologie et le tableau propos par Marie-laure Ryan (1991), qui identifie diff degr de la relation d’accessibilit partir des genres qui modifient la projection du monde actuel par le lecteur, dans l’univers de la fiction (en vertu du principe de l’ minimal Outre que la notion de genre ici mobilis pr la discussion, on pourrait objecter, comme le fait d’ailleurs L. Pavel de la compl ou de l’incompl des univers fictionnels, maximis ou minimis par l’auteur,La typologie des mondes possibles de la fiction Panorama critique et propositions,ray ban clubmaster, comme un principe stylistique, inscrit dans une temporalit historique. De m est expos la typologie de Dole d les principes constituants des univers fictionnels dans le cadre d’une s constructionnelle qui rendrait compte de la capacit d’un mod g des histoires,soldes longchamp pas cher.
Proposition 3 : On sugg la combinaison d’une th des modalit et de la notion de compl / incompl des univers fictionnels,lunette oakley, inscrite dans une temporalit historique. A titre d’exemple, le croisement des modalit d (permis/interdit/indiff et al (possible/impossible/n peut mis en relation, au dix-septi si avec la taille des romans,sacs moins cher, qui a directement voir avec une fa de minimiser ou de maximiser l’incompl des univers fictionnels.
Conclusion : L’ambigu de la notion de possibilit quand il s’agit de mondes faits de textes, est soulign Il est en effet difficile de ne pas prendre en compte,oakley pas cher, outre la possibilit logique,soldes sac, la possibilit subjective qui est impossible formaliser. Par ailleurs l’usage de la notion d’accessibilit dans le cadre d’une th litt des mondes possibles am presque toujours une conception de la litt comme mimesis.
Cependant, l’article plaide,lunettes carrera moins cher, pour finir,ray ban lunettes, pour un usage aussi peu m que possible de la notion de monde possible Il faudrait par exemple tenter une description des univers de la fiction au moyen des op de modalit ou une des embrayeurs de la fiction,ray ban pas cher, toujours dans une perspective diachronique, qui rendrait aussi compte de leur disparition,oakley jawbone.
Fran Lavocat
The typology of possible worlds of fiction
Critical overview and propositions
The aim of the seminar is to question whether the possible-worlds theory works for literary theory, and more precisely for textual analysis.
First mentioned are the past history of the approach, since the seventies, and the diversity of the theoretical horizons to which the researchers who will intervene in this seminar belong,lunette oakley. Moreover, the period in question is the very moment when the concept of fiction was born, and its boundaries considerably modified,Oakley Airwave, which makes it all the more interesting to study it in terms of possible worlds. We intend to discuss some of these theories, as well as a few alternative propositions.
1) Comparing Umberto Eco’s approach in Lector in Fabula with that of an article written by Pavel in 1975 brings out several difficulties when the matter at stake is to outline a typology of fictional universes, especially in a diachronic perspective. The first problem stems from the difficulty to reconstitute the to which the reader of the past is supposed to relate the work, in order to weigh up its truth value. It is based on name, limited to the modern period (from the middle ages to the late 17th century) and falls within the scope of a theory of name and reference inspired by Kripke and Putnam. Three main modes of fiction for the period in question are distinguished (allegory,carrera lunettes, actual fiction, and transfiction all that is covered by in the second degree The main hypotheses are that: 1) the disctinctive feature of fiction is that the work generates its own reference world; 2) the character, through the name he is given, is the main medium of reference; 3) the reference may be heterogeneous from one work to another, as well as within one work (in so far as it can refer to different domains of reference); 3) the status of a work as world of fiction depends on the modality of reference; 4) the distinctive feature of fiction, as it begins to be conceived in the 17th century, lies in the reduction of polyreference (reference to several worlds of fiction, which is characteristic of allegory and transfiction) to unique reference (to a world created by the text).
2nd proposition: A second typology is proposed, attempting to establish degrees of fictionality, by combining the individualisation of the characters and the field of reference to which they refer.
This kind of proposition may give rise to many an objection, especially from the theoreticians who assert that in a fictional world, the status of a character is homogeneous (Descombes, 1983), or those who refuse to base the ontological status of fiction on its relation to the actual world (Dolezel).
One might reply to these objections, for the moment, by putting forward the efficiency of the approach: a theory of degrees of fictionality enables us to underline some important generic differences and certain specific uses of fiction at a given time.
2) Other propositions are then looked into. They no longer concern the accessibility relation, but modalities and the notion of incompleteness. The theory of Pavel (1983 and 1986) and that of Dolezel (1985 and 1998) are confronted. The typology of Dolezel is also exposed, bringing out the constituent principles of the worlds of fiction within the scope of semantics which would explain the capacity of a model to generate stories.
3rd proposition: it is suggested that a theory of modalities and the notion of completeness / incompleteness of fictional worlds should be combined, within a historical temporality. For example, the crossing of deontic modalities (permitted/obligatory/forbidden) with alethic ones (possible/impossible/necessary) can be linked, in the seventeenth century, with the sizes of novels, which is directly linked to the minimizing or maximizing of the incompleteness of fictional worlds.
Conclusion: the ambiguity of the notion of possibility, when the worlds in question are made of texts, is underlined. Besides logical possibility, one has to take into account subjective possibility, which is impossible to formalize. Moreover, the use of the notion of accessibility within the scope of a literary theory of possible worlds almost always entails a conception of literature as mimesis. However, the article finally defends the idea of using the notion of world as little metaphorically as possible. One could, for instance, attempt a description of fictional worlds by means of modal operators, or a study of fiction shifters, still in a diachronic perspective, that would also account for their disparition.
articles connexes:
http://www.xiaoshuopinlu.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=133623
http://faceparti.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4424534
http://frcarrerapascher.webs.com
http://lunettesraybandiscount.webs.com/