rdinating the care of a patient might literally make the difference between life and death. The inovolvement of more than one physicians in the treatment of the patient raises the risk that some doctors might have critical information that needs to be relayed to the patient and the other physicians for important follow up. Without it the patient might go on lacking suitable and needed treatment. Patients seem to believe that the doctor will follow up with them in case there are any important results from testing ordered by the doctor,Red Bottoms. When people do not receive a follow up communication from a physician many view that as an indication that everthing is fine and that there is no need for them to follow up with the doctor,Red Bottom Shoes. A failure to do so may result in an undiagnosed or untreated disease or condition,Red Sole Shoes. And it may be medical negligence.
Consider the following reported lawsuit. Several physicians had a chance to diagnose the male patient’s prostate cancer The individual first consulted with his primary care physician, a general practitioner,http://www.theredbottoms2013.com, with complaints of urinary problems when he was 56 years old. The family physician assumed that the problems were not because of cancer. As such, the doctor failed to order any diagnostic testing, such as a biopsy and failed to refer the individual to a urologist.
The patient, on his own, saw a urologist ten months later. The urologist carried out a physical examination of the prostate and ordered a PSA blood test. The patient then discovered that his insurance carrier did not have the urologist in its list of approved physicians and he went to a different urologist who was approved.
Although the blood test results came in neither the results of the test nor the first urologist’s suspicion of cancer and advice that a biopsy be done were communicated to the individual’s PCS or to his second urologist. The second urologist decided that there were no abnormalities present with the prostate and that there was no evidence of cancer.
Consequently the cancer went undiagnosed for 2 years at which time it had spread outside the prostate. The physicians treating the patient’s cancer came to the conclusion that he likely had only 1 to 5 years to live because of the cancer’s spread. The law firm that helped the patient revealed that the resulting medical malpractice lawsuit settled for $2,500,000.
This lawsuit thus shows two key types of failures. There was the failure on the part of the general practitioner and the second urologist to not follow the proper screening guidelines. Additionally there was the failure of communication among the various doctors. While there is no way to know whether the general practitioner or the second urologist would have followed up on results of the PSA test from the first urologist or on that urologist’s suspicion and recommendation they at least would have had information and perspective they were missing.
Related articles:
http://ceo-minaki.akihabarahills.com/2012/04/psxperia.html#comments
http://3dmart.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3387788&pid=3729117&page=1&extra=page=1#pid3729117